🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that authorities allow or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would determine the timing and location protests can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "serious and undue restrictions" on civil liberties. Taken together, these incremental attacks on liberty have practically eliminated the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Atrocity to Justify Suppression

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be widespread consensus that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but perverts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at mass killing, you likely cannot draw the line at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Consider Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the global justice body to issue legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the state, and back the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to try to suppress a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government seems involved in this effort. Ministers have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a situation where police authorities can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed many thousands of human lives. British politicians and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a concerning threshold by banning Palestine Action, a non-violent, anti-genocide activist collective. Thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, primarily for carrying signs against mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a retired priest and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" other nations, while the sitting leader characterized such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, endured hardship and died to establish our liberties. We may eventually regret how casually we permitted them to slip away.